Από το blog του Θεόδωρου Κατσανέβα
WEEKLY NEWSLETTER
Volume 27, No. 14 - April 4, 2013
The confiscation of bank accounts in Cyprus is but the first implementation of a long-planned solution for the entire trans-Atlantic region. Under the new scheme, the bank bailouts,which have been carried out since 2008 with taxpayers’ money,are to be replaced by bank “bail-ins”, i.e. the money of the respective shareholders and depositors will be expropriated to recapitalize the banks.
The European parliament will soon be voting a bank resolution legislation submitted by the EU Commission on June 6, 2012, which is centered on a bail-in scheme including confiscation of deposits above the guaranteed threshold of EU100,000. The man leading the negotiations with the EU member states on finalizing that legislation, MEP Gunnar Hokmark (Sweden,European People’s Party group), made that crystal clear in
remarks on March 29. “You need to be able to do the bailin as well with deposits,” he told Reuters. “Deposits below EU100,000 are protected... deposits above EU100,000 are not protected and shall be treated as part of the capital that can be bailed in.” He is confident, he added, that a majority of the other European parliamentarians support the idea.
On March 25, the new chairman of the Euro Group, Dutchman Jeroen Dijsselbloem, had created a furor when he stated that the seizure of bank accounts in Cyprus was a “template” for the Eurozone. Dijsselbloem himself, as well as other European authorities, then had to backtrack, and claim that Cyprus was “unique.” But European Central Bank Governing Councl member Klaas Knot told the Dutch daily Het Financieele Dagblad a few days later that this policy has been “on the table for a longer time” in Europe.
Indeed, the draft legislation at the European Parliament is proof that the Cyprus bank robbery was not a last-minute invention by the German government, but rather a well-planned operation concocted by the EU Commission.
There, the depositors with accounts larger than €100,000, about to be fleeced, include small and medium enterprises, which have business accounts at banks through which they receive payments from customers, and from which they make payments to their vendors, pay taxes and payroll withholdings (e.g. social security contributions), pay employees, etc. In other words, they use the accounts to run their businesses. These are
the most liquid assets that are in the banks which can be stolen.
When they are, the economy will immediately collapse. Depositors can be looted also through the Spanish variant: one million Spanish households were swindled into using their savings to buy “preferred stocks”’ (preferentes) in most of the major banks of the country. As in the case of bankrupt Bankia, those
stocks are now worth less than 1% of their original value. Yet another version is planned for Italy, which could come under the Troika regime in the case of protracted ungovernability.
Italy has no big banking problem, but a state debt of 127% to GDP, a large chunk of which is trade on international markets. In order to guarantee that debt for bondholders, Jörg Krämer, chief economist of Commerzbank, proposed to reduce it to 100% of GDP by implementing a 15% levy on Italian private wealth, claiming that Italians are “richer” than Germans and can afford it. He used, among others, statistics published
by the Bundesbank showing that average Italian private wealth, at EU164,000, is far more than the German average of EU76,000. These figures, however, include financial wealth as well as property, such as housing real estate, and two-thirds of Italians are homeowners, compared to 44% of Germans. Average income in Italy is much lower than in Germany: EU19,655 per year per capita as against well over EU30,000.
However, as Cyprus is being hit by all the calamities which euro-fanatics said would come down on any country that leaves the euro, but without the advantage of returning to a national currency, a growing number of Italians are publicly asking whether the cost of remaining in the Eurozone is too high. Similar Schemes in the UK and the U.S.
A joint paper written by the US. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Bank of England issued on Dec. 10, 2012, shows that U.S and UK authorities are also planning to loot depositors’ money exactly like the EU. The BOE-FDIC document considers deposits in the banks as “unsecured creditors,” and thus subject to seizure for bailing in the banks. In a comment on the paper, author Ellen Brown wrote on truthdig.com on March 28: “No exception is indicated for ‘insured deposits’ in the U.S. meaning those under $250,000, the deposits we thought were protected by FDIC insurance. This can hardly be an oversight, since it is the FDIC that is issuing
the directive.” She adds: “If the anticipated enabling legislation is passed, the FDIC will no longer need to protect depositor funds; it can just confiscate them.”
To complete the trans-Atlantic picture, the Hellasfrappe blog reports that Canada’s “Economic Action Plan 2013” suggests that banks can be recapitalized by converting certain liabilities, including deposits, into regulatory capital.
EIR STRATEGIC ALERT 2 WEEKLY NEWSLETTER n°14 / 2013
The schemes are very close to being implemented. The popular financial blog, the Slog on March 29 gave the example of Bank Santander UK, which it says just sent out a notice to its customers, on changed terms and conditions for “Santander business current accounts and business savings accounts” with a business turnover up £250,000.” That would include small and medium enterprises.
The notice says that “Any money held for you in an account with Santander UK plc will be held in its capacity as a bank and not as a trustee. In accordance with Financial Service Authority requirements we are obliged to notify you that the client money rules on money do not apply to a Banking Consolidation Directive (BCD) in relation to deposits within the meaning of the BCD held by that institution. As a result, the money will not be held within the client money rules of the FSA.” So, the cat is finally coming out of the bag. That also explains why the Obama Administation and EU leaders have increased the pressure to quash the debate on Glass-Steagall bank separation, which is the only orderly way to save the citizens’ legitimate assets.
For Lyndon LaRouche, this comes as no surprise. As we reported at the time, he warned against the precise policy that is outlined in the BOE-FDIC plan -- and explained why only Glass-Steagall is a viable alternative -- in his Feb. 15, 2013 webcast, where he forecast:
“The vast mass of debt, which is represented by the monetarist operation, would be cancelled. In its place, they would have a new system of finances, which ignores entirely all the obligations associated with the old! Which would mean that most of the people of the world would be starving to death, quickly.... I know exactly what they’re doing, because I know how systems work. And what they’re doing, the only way it will work, is to cancel the entire bailout system -- just wipe it off the plate, and come in with a new system, in which people who are privileged will be brought into that system, and they will be given relatively good incomes to live on, but unfortunately the greater majority of the population will have none. This is the greatest population-reduction scheme so far in known history. And that’s what the policy of the people who oppose Glass-Steagall is -- whether they themselves know it or not. But they will be held accountable for the effect of that policy.” BüSo Campaign for Bank Separation Covered in Media
Behind closed doors, politicians and businessmen in Germany have long been discussing the mobilization of the Civil Rights Movement-Solidarity (BüSo) and the Schiller Institute for an authentic separation of banks. FDP parliamentarian Frank Schäffler is one of the few who have recognized it openly – and in written form – on a recent blog (cf. SAS 12/13). Now, the breathtakingly rapid unravelling of the euro system is forcing the issue even more to the fore.
The lively BüSo campaign on the streets of Berlin attracted the attention of the editor of the online newspaper Deutsch-Türkische Nachrichten (DTN), which published March 22 an article based on discussions with party members. “The Bürgerrechtsbewegung Solidarität“ (BüSo) demands the separation of investment banks and commercial banks. Small savers should not have to cover the risks of investment deals with their bank deposits,” the article begins. “The party state chairman says: if the banks in Cyprus go under, it will trigger a dramatic chain reaction in the EU. The euro as a currency is extremely endangered.”
After describing what an activist told him on the original Glass-Steagall Act, and its strict separation of investment activity from deposits, the article notes that the unseparated universal banks of today encompass all banking and financial services. “The clients’ deposits of clients are used for speculative deals.” In a separate discussion with Dr. Wolfgang Lillge, the state party chairman, DTN was told that the German population is not aware of the risks of the Cyprus crisis. “The present banking system in Cyprus is the same in the other EU countries. A collapse in Cyprus would lead to a chain reaction in the euro area. Many banks would default. That would be the end of the euro, Lillge says. The idea of the mandatory levy only shows how great the panic is.”
“But in the USA, a re-thinking can be observed,” the article ends. “The pioneer for the reintroduction of separated banks is U.S. Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur. In 2012, she launched a legislative initiative in which she called for the reinstitution of the Glass-Steagall Act. 80 more members of Congress and organizations signed on to the initiative.”
The article is illustrated with a picture of Franklin Roosevelt at a news conference, and the caption “Roosevelt was a great promoter of separated banks.”
“Cyprus Should Leave the Eurozone”, Jacques Cheminade Tells Hellada
The Greek daily Hellada (Greece) of March 27 published a hard-hitting interview with Jacques Cheminade, former French Presidential candidate and LaRouche movement leader in France, under the headline “The Eurozone Supports the Banking Oligarchy”. The interview hit the streets of Greece at a time when the Greeks are still in a state of shock over the Eurogroup’s unprecedented confiscation of bank deposits in Cyprus, and Cheminade’s remarks are certain to strengthen popular resistance to EU policy among Greeks. The one question on everyone’s mind, which Hellada highlighted on the two page spread, is: “Should Cyprus choose to leave the Eurozone, and if yes, how should the Cypriot government manage the ‘next day’?”
Cheminade’s reply was straight-forward: “My answer is that every member nation should leave the Eurozone, for the common good of all. The euro was created by monetarist central bankers, the likes of Robert Mundell, and imposed on Chancellor Kohl by President Mitterrand. It was doomed to fail from the word go.
“As for Cyprus, it should leave. It is not going to be a bed of roses, but as Greece knows, to stay inside means to be tortured from outside. The point is that there is no national fallback option per se. So Cyprus should proceed in cornering the Eurozone authorities, and exhibiting to the eyes of the world their incompetence and injustice. This in turn, if well negotiated with Russia and also China, should create a wave throughout Europe and the whole trans-Atlantic world financial system. At the same time, to avoid the chaos and confusion coming from
such an initiative, Cyprus should call for a global Glass-Steagall and a New Bretton Woods, together with Greece. As for Europe, it has to be rebuilt as an association of sovereign nations with common development projects, a Europe of the peoples and the fatherlands.
“Cyprus can be the grain of sand that changes history, provided that she considers herself as a detonator for a new paradigm on a world scale.” In answering the first question, on the main causes of the current crisis, and the solution, Cheminade gave an idea of just EIR STRATEGIC ALERT n°14 / 2013 WEEKLY NEWSLETTER 3
how huge the problem worldwide is, by mentioning one figure. When he first denounced financial derivative products, which are bets on future prices, in 1993, they amounted to a total of about 5 trillion dollars. Now they are officially at 700 trillion, more than ten times the yearly Gross National Product of the entire world! “This system is a true financial madhouse.”
The vice behind the euro, Cheminade said, is that “it was not created to support development projects or social policies, but to enforce so-called orthodox monetarist policies, which mean austerity for the people and indefinite State bail out for the banks ‘too big to fail’. Those banks have been involved in actual gigantic frauds, for example on the Libor and Euribor interest rates, to such an extent that now it is openly said that they are also ‘too big to jail’.
“Eric Holder, the Attorney General of the treacherous Obama Administration, has just admitted that he will not go after those banking interests, because to enforce the existent laws and Constitutional principles would lead to a disintegration of the national (U.S.) and international financial system! In other words, this financial oligarchy ruins real production, ruins agriculture and industry, and imposes austerity on the people just to keep its power worldwide. The Eurozone has become their auxiliary. This is no more capitalism or even financial capitalism, it is financial fascism.
“The solution to this murderous mess is to re-establish the priority of production and labor through a Glass-Steagall system, a State credit policy for infrastructure and the creation of economic platforms based on more advanced, more productive technologies, and a concept of qualified, inventive and properly paid labor. We have to clean up the mess – with a Glass-Steagall – and at the same time build the future – a credit system.” In other answers, Cheminade dealt with the need to finance the plan elaborated by the LaRouche movement for integrating the Mediterranean into the Eurasian Land-Bridge, and underlined the need for Europe to cooperate with Russia on development projects as well as on the defense of the Earth against dangers from outer space. Jacques Cheminade in Swiss Bilan: Time to End the Bubble Economy! The associate editor-in-chief of the Swiss economic magazine Bilan, Myret Zaki, invited Jacques Cheminade into the studio on March 13 for a fascinating discussion of the financial crisis and the way out of it, the video of which is posted on the website. The 45 minute debate brought together two highly knowledgeable observers of the financial world, as Myret Zaki herself has written books and innumerable articles on the financial bubbles, the irrationality of the dollar system, and the economic war waged against Switzerland. Zaki opened the discussion began with the issue of austerity, asking how it can be avoided when states have been bankrupted by the bank bailouts. We can’t undo that, she said, but what is the alternative. Cheminade countered that the “rigor” needed should be applied to the banks that speculated and not to the peoples. He compared the policy of the international community to the remedy of Molière’s doctor: the patient is sick, so he is bled, he gets even sicker, and is bled again. In the end, he’s healed, but he’s dead ! Today, the Greeks are cutting trees in public parks to heat their homes, while tuberculosis and malaria are reemerging. In Portugal, millions of people are singing the songs of the Revolution that brought down the dictator Salazar on July 25, 1974, to denounce another, yet more murderous, dictatorship, that of the Troika. I agree with you on that, Zaki conceded. She later noted that the austerity imposed on Portugal in 2012 was of the same amount (1.5 billion euros) as the profits earned during 2011 by three hedge funds alone through speculating against Portugal.
The discussion went through the dangerous policy of monetary expansion by the Federal Reserve, and the absurdity of a situation where the stock exchanges today are higher than ever, while the economy is in a shambles. What is the alternative, Zaki asked, since in her view, wiping out the debt is indefensible from a moral standpoint. In reply, Cheminade said, we have to see who created that debt. And we have to distinguish between state debt and bank debts. For the latter, the legitimate debts have to be separated from the illegitimate ones in the framework of Glass-Steagall legislation.And that will mean bankruptcies among the investment banks. There have to be some bankruptcies, Zaki exclaimed. There are some people, who made excessive debts, who will have to take the losses.
On the question of gold, both specialists went through the manipulations of this market. Since 2009, they agreed, China managed to purchase between 4,000 and 6,000 tons of gold! But, Cheminade added, that will not allow China to escape from the tsunami of a global crisis of the trans-Atlantic system. A new Bretton Woods is necessary: strict separation of the banks, an agreement among nation states to issue long-term credit in great projects and high-technology. That used to be the case in Switzerland, Cheminade said, when investments were made in pharmaceuticals, the chemical industry and metallurgy.
Otherwise, we will end up in a war of all against all, Cheminade said, going into the Anglo-American maneuvers to eliminate the Swiss tax haven to their own advantage. Zaki, who wrote a book on this in 2010, confirmed that Anglo-American offshore trusts and companies have taken over since then. Today, the only way to avoid taxes is to use Anglo-American tax havens. The last issue debated was the free trade agreement being pushed between the European Union and the United States. But can two limpers really be expected to stand straight?, Myret Zaki asked. The purpose, Cheminade said, is to destroy any remaining resistance in the nation-states, in particular agricultural self-sufficiency in Switzerland, and in France. What is ne eded is an intelligent protectionism so that budding industries and populations are safe from dumping. Schiller Institute Conference Focusses on Solutions to Strategic and Economic Crises
On March 23, 1983, U.S. President Ronald Reagan announced an historic initiative to “render nuclear weapons obsolete”, later to be called the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), whichwas based on a proposal developed in particular by Lyndon La-Rouche over the preceding years.
Thirty years later to the day, while that program was never implemented, the Schiller Institute held a major conference near Washington to deliberate on “A New Paradigm to Save Mankind, The Need for the Principle of the SDI Today.” Indeed, the danger of thermonuclear war is still very much a reality today, while the economic crisis is far worse. Helga Zepp-LaRouche stated in her keynote presentation: “I would really emphasize that the continued existence of civilization depends on two preconditions: One is the immediate -- and I really mean immediate, that is, in the next days, or at maximum, weeks -- implementation of Glass-Steagall. And the EIR STRATEGIC ALERT 4 WEEKLY NEWSLETTER n° 14 / 2013 second condition is to finally implement the Strategic Defense of the Earth, in the tradition of the SDI.”
The conference featured two panel discussions, the first of the need for a transition from the SDI to the Strategic Defense of Earth (SDE), and the second on the solution to the economic crisis, which includes bank separation as a first step. After Zepp-LaRouche’s keynote, EIR Counterintelligence Editor Jeffrey Steinberg presented the inside history of the initiation of the SDI program, focussing on the role of Lyndon La-Rouche and his political movement. With the agreement of the Reagan Administration, LaRouche had been negotiating with Soviet diplomats on the possibility of joint development of such systems, based on new physical principles, to destroy missiles after launch, but before they actually reach their target. When President Reagan officially made the offer, in 1983, Soviet leaders rejected it.
LaRouche himself then made make brief remarks about the necessity of stopping the process leading to nuclear war, while at the same time moving to the urgent mission of organizing a planetary defense, against objects from the Solar System threatening the Earth. Three presentations followed which dealt with some of the
technical and political aspects of SDI implementation. The first was by Frank Cevasco, who was in the Office of the Secretary of Defense during the time of the Reagan announcement and its aftermath; the second by Kevin Zondervan, an aerospace engineer who gave a presentation authorized by the Missile Defense Agency, on the public domain information on the current Ballistic Missile Defense System; and the third by Ben Deniston
of LaRouchePAC, who went into the movement’s work on defense of the planet against asteroids.
The final presentation on the panel was by Bruce Fein, a constitutional lawyer and former Deputy Attorney General in the Reagan Administration, who spoke on the “Lessons of the Reagan Era for Today’s Challenges.” The Committee on Implementation of the International Global Monitoring Aerospace System (IGMASS) project, a Russian initiative for defense of Earth from seismic, weather, and space threats, sent greetings to the Schiller Institute conference in the form of a Russian TV feature on IGMASS, including an interview with the committee’s chairman, Prof. Anatoli Perminov (former head of Roscosmos, the Russian space agency). In a letter thanking the Schiller Institute conference organizers for giving “encouragement” to the IGMASS project, Perminov wrote, “We believe that realization of the Project in its pilot version will convince the world community [of the] feasibility of the high objectives of IGMASS, aimed at gradual development of a unified global security field with respect to global natural and man-made threats in the framework of a new paradigm of international cooperation, on the way to overcome existing tension and conflicts.”
The discussion period after this panel provided an opportunity to underscore that today’s Cheney-Obama vintage global Ballistic Missile Defense System is not a realization of the vision of LaRouche and Reagan for strategic cooperation against the threat of thermonuclear war. The BMDS does represent a threat to the strategic nuclear deterrent forces of Russia and China, something which would not have been the case with implementation of the full SDI conception of strategic cooperation, including “open laboratory” sharing of technology. A number of post-Soviet Russian offers for strategic defense cooperation have been rejected or ignored in the West, including Moscow’s 1993 “Trust” proposal for U.S.-Russian experiments on anti-missile “plasma weapon” technologies, and then Prime Minister Putin’s 2007 Kennebunkport overture for joint operation of anti-missile radars and other systems in Eurasia. The conference participants also heard greetings read from the first spokesman from the developing sector to endorse La-Rouche’s beam weapons proposal in the 1980s, Gen. Hector Fautario of Argentina.
Stopping the Hyperinflationary Blowout
The second panel of the conference featured presentations on LaRouche’s program to stop the breakdown crisis, and the organizing drive now underway in the United States to implement that program. One special contribution to the panel was a video address by Republican Representative Walter Jones, who urged the assembled to mobilize for the current House bill which would reinstate Glass-Steagall, HR 129, a bill of which he is a co-sponsor along with 45 others as of this writing. He also addressed the strategic crisis, by presenting his initiative demanding that Congress declassify 28 pages of the 9/11 Commission report, which would reveal that Saudi officials were behind the devastating 2001 attacks on the United States. After a keynote by EIR Ibero-American editor Dennis Small, which stressed the crucial economic parameter of the productive powers of labor as the means for evaluating an economy’s performance and potential, two state leaders presented reports on their battles for Glass-Steagall. State Rep. Thomas Jackson of Alabama, the chairman of the Alabama House Democratic Caucus, and James Benham, president of the Indiana Farmers Union, gave lively accounts of the conditions they face in organizing for bank separation in their respective states. Benham presented in particular the need for such protection in the agricultural sector.
Concluding the session were two LaRouche movement organizers actively involved in the fight in Washington, D.C. to pass LaRouche’s program: Michael Kirsch, who authored the La-RouchePAC’s latest proposal for a new National Bank, and Paul Gallagher, Economics Editor of EIR, who has been intimately involved in the drive for passing Glass-Steagall in Congress. Gallagher, who, as head of the Fusion Energy Foundation, also spearheaded the drive for the SDI in 1983, provided a crucial reflection comparing the fights then and now. Three months before Reagan announced the SDI, he said, everyone said it would never be done; today, “popular wisdom” in Washington also says Glass-Steagall will never be restored. With the proper fight by a leadership which knows what is at stake and can convey it, that popular wisdom will be proven wrong again.
The conference concluded with an evening concert, which uplifted the participants for the fight ahead.
E.I.R. STRATEGIC ALERT
www.eir.de Published by: E.I.R.GmbH, Bahnstr. 9a, 65205 Wiesbaden
Tel.: 0611/73650, Fax: 0611/7365101, Email: eirna@eirna.com
Verantwortl. f. d. Inhalt: Dean Andromidas, Claudio Celani
Subscription: EUR 3000/ ISSN 0936-7527
© E.I.R. GmbH Alle Rechte vorbehalten, auch die des Nachdrucks
von Auszügen, derphotomechanischen Wiedergabe und der Übersetzung,
Printed in Germany
WEEKLY NEWSLETTER
Volume 27, No. 14 - April 4, 2013
The confiscation of bank accounts in Cyprus is but the first implementation of a long-planned solution for the entire trans-Atlantic region. Under the new scheme, the bank bailouts,which have been carried out since 2008 with taxpayers’ money,are to be replaced by bank “bail-ins”, i.e. the money of the respective shareholders and depositors will be expropriated to recapitalize the banks.
The European parliament will soon be voting a bank resolution legislation submitted by the EU Commission on June 6, 2012, which is centered on a bail-in scheme including confiscation of deposits above the guaranteed threshold of EU100,000. The man leading the negotiations with the EU member states on finalizing that legislation, MEP Gunnar Hokmark (Sweden,European People’s Party group), made that crystal clear in
remarks on March 29. “You need to be able to do the bailin as well with deposits,” he told Reuters. “Deposits below EU100,000 are protected... deposits above EU100,000 are not protected and shall be treated as part of the capital that can be bailed in.” He is confident, he added, that a majority of the other European parliamentarians support the idea.
On March 25, the new chairman of the Euro Group, Dutchman Jeroen Dijsselbloem, had created a furor when he stated that the seizure of bank accounts in Cyprus was a “template” for the Eurozone. Dijsselbloem himself, as well as other European authorities, then had to backtrack, and claim that Cyprus was “unique.” But European Central Bank Governing Councl member Klaas Knot told the Dutch daily Het Financieele Dagblad a few days later that this policy has been “on the table for a longer time” in Europe.
Indeed, the draft legislation at the European Parliament is proof that the Cyprus bank robbery was not a last-minute invention by the German government, but rather a well-planned operation concocted by the EU Commission.
There, the depositors with accounts larger than €100,000, about to be fleeced, include small and medium enterprises, which have business accounts at banks through which they receive payments from customers, and from which they make payments to their vendors, pay taxes and payroll withholdings (e.g. social security contributions), pay employees, etc. In other words, they use the accounts to run their businesses. These are
the most liquid assets that are in the banks which can be stolen.
When they are, the economy will immediately collapse. Depositors can be looted also through the Spanish variant: one million Spanish households were swindled into using their savings to buy “preferred stocks”’ (preferentes) in most of the major banks of the country. As in the case of bankrupt Bankia, those
stocks are now worth less than 1% of their original value. Yet another version is planned for Italy, which could come under the Troika regime in the case of protracted ungovernability.
Italy has no big banking problem, but a state debt of 127% to GDP, a large chunk of which is trade on international markets. In order to guarantee that debt for bondholders, Jörg Krämer, chief economist of Commerzbank, proposed to reduce it to 100% of GDP by implementing a 15% levy on Italian private wealth, claiming that Italians are “richer” than Germans and can afford it. He used, among others, statistics published
by the Bundesbank showing that average Italian private wealth, at EU164,000, is far more than the German average of EU76,000. These figures, however, include financial wealth as well as property, such as housing real estate, and two-thirds of Italians are homeowners, compared to 44% of Germans. Average income in Italy is much lower than in Germany: EU19,655 per year per capita as against well over EU30,000.
However, as Cyprus is being hit by all the calamities which euro-fanatics said would come down on any country that leaves the euro, but without the advantage of returning to a national currency, a growing number of Italians are publicly asking whether the cost of remaining in the Eurozone is too high. Similar Schemes in the UK and the U.S.
A joint paper written by the US. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Bank of England issued on Dec. 10, 2012, shows that U.S and UK authorities are also planning to loot depositors’ money exactly like the EU. The BOE-FDIC document considers deposits in the banks as “unsecured creditors,” and thus subject to seizure for bailing in the banks. In a comment on the paper, author Ellen Brown wrote on truthdig.com on March 28: “No exception is indicated for ‘insured deposits’ in the U.S. meaning those under $250,000, the deposits we thought were protected by FDIC insurance. This can hardly be an oversight, since it is the FDIC that is issuing
the directive.” She adds: “If the anticipated enabling legislation is passed, the FDIC will no longer need to protect depositor funds; it can just confiscate them.”
To complete the trans-Atlantic picture, the Hellasfrappe blog reports that Canada’s “Economic Action Plan 2013” suggests that banks can be recapitalized by converting certain liabilities, including deposits, into regulatory capital.
EIR STRATEGIC ALERT 2 WEEKLY NEWSLETTER n°14 / 2013
The schemes are very close to being implemented. The popular financial blog, the Slog on March 29 gave the example of Bank Santander UK, which it says just sent out a notice to its customers, on changed terms and conditions for “Santander business current accounts and business savings accounts” with a business turnover up £250,000.” That would include small and medium enterprises.
The notice says that “Any money held for you in an account with Santander UK plc will be held in its capacity as a bank and not as a trustee. In accordance with Financial Service Authority requirements we are obliged to notify you that the client money rules on money do not apply to a Banking Consolidation Directive (BCD) in relation to deposits within the meaning of the BCD held by that institution. As a result, the money will not be held within the client money rules of the FSA.” So, the cat is finally coming out of the bag. That also explains why the Obama Administation and EU leaders have increased the pressure to quash the debate on Glass-Steagall bank separation, which is the only orderly way to save the citizens’ legitimate assets.
For Lyndon LaRouche, this comes as no surprise. As we reported at the time, he warned against the precise policy that is outlined in the BOE-FDIC plan -- and explained why only Glass-Steagall is a viable alternative -- in his Feb. 15, 2013 webcast, where he forecast:
“The vast mass of debt, which is represented by the monetarist operation, would be cancelled. In its place, they would have a new system of finances, which ignores entirely all the obligations associated with the old! Which would mean that most of the people of the world would be starving to death, quickly.... I know exactly what they’re doing, because I know how systems work. And what they’re doing, the only way it will work, is to cancel the entire bailout system -- just wipe it off the plate, and come in with a new system, in which people who are privileged will be brought into that system, and they will be given relatively good incomes to live on, but unfortunately the greater majority of the population will have none. This is the greatest population-reduction scheme so far in known history. And that’s what the policy of the people who oppose Glass-Steagall is -- whether they themselves know it or not. But they will be held accountable for the effect of that policy.” BüSo Campaign for Bank Separation Covered in Media
Behind closed doors, politicians and businessmen in Germany have long been discussing the mobilization of the Civil Rights Movement-Solidarity (BüSo) and the Schiller Institute for an authentic separation of banks. FDP parliamentarian Frank Schäffler is one of the few who have recognized it openly – and in written form – on a recent blog (cf. SAS 12/13). Now, the breathtakingly rapid unravelling of the euro system is forcing the issue even more to the fore.
The lively BüSo campaign on the streets of Berlin attracted the attention of the editor of the online newspaper Deutsch-Türkische Nachrichten (DTN), which published March 22 an article based on discussions with party members. “The Bürgerrechtsbewegung Solidarität“ (BüSo) demands the separation of investment banks and commercial banks. Small savers should not have to cover the risks of investment deals with their bank deposits,” the article begins. “The party state chairman says: if the banks in Cyprus go under, it will trigger a dramatic chain reaction in the EU. The euro as a currency is extremely endangered.”
After describing what an activist told him on the original Glass-Steagall Act, and its strict separation of investment activity from deposits, the article notes that the unseparated universal banks of today encompass all banking and financial services. “The clients’ deposits of clients are used for speculative deals.” In a separate discussion with Dr. Wolfgang Lillge, the state party chairman, DTN was told that the German population is not aware of the risks of the Cyprus crisis. “The present banking system in Cyprus is the same in the other EU countries. A collapse in Cyprus would lead to a chain reaction in the euro area. Many banks would default. That would be the end of the euro, Lillge says. The idea of the mandatory levy only shows how great the panic is.”
“But in the USA, a re-thinking can be observed,” the article ends. “The pioneer for the reintroduction of separated banks is U.S. Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur. In 2012, she launched a legislative initiative in which she called for the reinstitution of the Glass-Steagall Act. 80 more members of Congress and organizations signed on to the initiative.”
The article is illustrated with a picture of Franklin Roosevelt at a news conference, and the caption “Roosevelt was a great promoter of separated banks.”
“Cyprus Should Leave the Eurozone”, Jacques Cheminade Tells Hellada
The Greek daily Hellada (Greece) of March 27 published a hard-hitting interview with Jacques Cheminade, former French Presidential candidate and LaRouche movement leader in France, under the headline “The Eurozone Supports the Banking Oligarchy”. The interview hit the streets of Greece at a time when the Greeks are still in a state of shock over the Eurogroup’s unprecedented confiscation of bank deposits in Cyprus, and Cheminade’s remarks are certain to strengthen popular resistance to EU policy among Greeks. The one question on everyone’s mind, which Hellada highlighted on the two page spread, is: “Should Cyprus choose to leave the Eurozone, and if yes, how should the Cypriot government manage the ‘next day’?”
Cheminade’s reply was straight-forward: “My answer is that every member nation should leave the Eurozone, for the common good of all. The euro was created by monetarist central bankers, the likes of Robert Mundell, and imposed on Chancellor Kohl by President Mitterrand. It was doomed to fail from the word go.
“As for Cyprus, it should leave. It is not going to be a bed of roses, but as Greece knows, to stay inside means to be tortured from outside. The point is that there is no national fallback option per se. So Cyprus should proceed in cornering the Eurozone authorities, and exhibiting to the eyes of the world their incompetence and injustice. This in turn, if well negotiated with Russia and also China, should create a wave throughout Europe and the whole trans-Atlantic world financial system. At the same time, to avoid the chaos and confusion coming from
such an initiative, Cyprus should call for a global Glass-Steagall and a New Bretton Woods, together with Greece. As for Europe, it has to be rebuilt as an association of sovereign nations with common development projects, a Europe of the peoples and the fatherlands.
“Cyprus can be the grain of sand that changes history, provided that she considers herself as a detonator for a new paradigm on a world scale.” In answering the first question, on the main causes of the current crisis, and the solution, Cheminade gave an idea of just EIR STRATEGIC ALERT n°14 / 2013 WEEKLY NEWSLETTER 3
how huge the problem worldwide is, by mentioning one figure. When he first denounced financial derivative products, which are bets on future prices, in 1993, they amounted to a total of about 5 trillion dollars. Now they are officially at 700 trillion, more than ten times the yearly Gross National Product of the entire world! “This system is a true financial madhouse.”
The vice behind the euro, Cheminade said, is that “it was not created to support development projects or social policies, but to enforce so-called orthodox monetarist policies, which mean austerity for the people and indefinite State bail out for the banks ‘too big to fail’. Those banks have been involved in actual gigantic frauds, for example on the Libor and Euribor interest rates, to such an extent that now it is openly said that they are also ‘too big to jail’.
“Eric Holder, the Attorney General of the treacherous Obama Administration, has just admitted that he will not go after those banking interests, because to enforce the existent laws and Constitutional principles would lead to a disintegration of the national (U.S.) and international financial system! In other words, this financial oligarchy ruins real production, ruins agriculture and industry, and imposes austerity on the people just to keep its power worldwide. The Eurozone has become their auxiliary. This is no more capitalism or even financial capitalism, it is financial fascism.
“The solution to this murderous mess is to re-establish the priority of production and labor through a Glass-Steagall system, a State credit policy for infrastructure and the creation of economic platforms based on more advanced, more productive technologies, and a concept of qualified, inventive and properly paid labor. We have to clean up the mess – with a Glass-Steagall – and at the same time build the future – a credit system.” In other answers, Cheminade dealt with the need to finance the plan elaborated by the LaRouche movement for integrating the Mediterranean into the Eurasian Land-Bridge, and underlined the need for Europe to cooperate with Russia on development projects as well as on the defense of the Earth against dangers from outer space. Jacques Cheminade in Swiss Bilan: Time to End the Bubble Economy! The associate editor-in-chief of the Swiss economic magazine Bilan, Myret Zaki, invited Jacques Cheminade into the studio on March 13 for a fascinating discussion of the financial crisis and the way out of it, the video of which is posted on the website. The 45 minute debate brought together two highly knowledgeable observers of the financial world, as Myret Zaki herself has written books and innumerable articles on the financial bubbles, the irrationality of the dollar system, and the economic war waged against Switzerland. Zaki opened the discussion began with the issue of austerity, asking how it can be avoided when states have been bankrupted by the bank bailouts. We can’t undo that, she said, but what is the alternative. Cheminade countered that the “rigor” needed should be applied to the banks that speculated and not to the peoples. He compared the policy of the international community to the remedy of Molière’s doctor: the patient is sick, so he is bled, he gets even sicker, and is bled again. In the end, he’s healed, but he’s dead ! Today, the Greeks are cutting trees in public parks to heat their homes, while tuberculosis and malaria are reemerging. In Portugal, millions of people are singing the songs of the Revolution that brought down the dictator Salazar on July 25, 1974, to denounce another, yet more murderous, dictatorship, that of the Troika. I agree with you on that, Zaki conceded. She later noted that the austerity imposed on Portugal in 2012 was of the same amount (1.5 billion euros) as the profits earned during 2011 by three hedge funds alone through speculating against Portugal.
The discussion went through the dangerous policy of monetary expansion by the Federal Reserve, and the absurdity of a situation where the stock exchanges today are higher than ever, while the economy is in a shambles. What is the alternative, Zaki asked, since in her view, wiping out the debt is indefensible from a moral standpoint. In reply, Cheminade said, we have to see who created that debt. And we have to distinguish between state debt and bank debts. For the latter, the legitimate debts have to be separated from the illegitimate ones in the framework of Glass-Steagall legislation.And that will mean bankruptcies among the investment banks. There have to be some bankruptcies, Zaki exclaimed. There are some people, who made excessive debts, who will have to take the losses.
On the question of gold, both specialists went through the manipulations of this market. Since 2009, they agreed, China managed to purchase between 4,000 and 6,000 tons of gold! But, Cheminade added, that will not allow China to escape from the tsunami of a global crisis of the trans-Atlantic system. A new Bretton Woods is necessary: strict separation of the banks, an agreement among nation states to issue long-term credit in great projects and high-technology. That used to be the case in Switzerland, Cheminade said, when investments were made in pharmaceuticals, the chemical industry and metallurgy.
Otherwise, we will end up in a war of all against all, Cheminade said, going into the Anglo-American maneuvers to eliminate the Swiss tax haven to their own advantage. Zaki, who wrote a book on this in 2010, confirmed that Anglo-American offshore trusts and companies have taken over since then. Today, the only way to avoid taxes is to use Anglo-American tax havens. The last issue debated was the free trade agreement being pushed between the European Union and the United States. But can two limpers really be expected to stand straight?, Myret Zaki asked. The purpose, Cheminade said, is to destroy any remaining resistance in the nation-states, in particular agricultural self-sufficiency in Switzerland, and in France. What is ne eded is an intelligent protectionism so that budding industries and populations are safe from dumping. Schiller Institute Conference Focusses on Solutions to Strategic and Economic Crises
On March 23, 1983, U.S. President Ronald Reagan announced an historic initiative to “render nuclear weapons obsolete”, later to be called the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), whichwas based on a proposal developed in particular by Lyndon La-Rouche over the preceding years.
Thirty years later to the day, while that program was never implemented, the Schiller Institute held a major conference near Washington to deliberate on “A New Paradigm to Save Mankind, The Need for the Principle of the SDI Today.” Indeed, the danger of thermonuclear war is still very much a reality today, while the economic crisis is far worse. Helga Zepp-LaRouche stated in her keynote presentation: “I would really emphasize that the continued existence of civilization depends on two preconditions: One is the immediate -- and I really mean immediate, that is, in the next days, or at maximum, weeks -- implementation of Glass-Steagall. And the EIR STRATEGIC ALERT 4 WEEKLY NEWSLETTER n° 14 / 2013 second condition is to finally implement the Strategic Defense of the Earth, in the tradition of the SDI.”
The conference featured two panel discussions, the first of the need for a transition from the SDI to the Strategic Defense of Earth (SDE), and the second on the solution to the economic crisis, which includes bank separation as a first step. After Zepp-LaRouche’s keynote, EIR Counterintelligence Editor Jeffrey Steinberg presented the inside history of the initiation of the SDI program, focussing on the role of Lyndon La-Rouche and his political movement. With the agreement of the Reagan Administration, LaRouche had been negotiating with Soviet diplomats on the possibility of joint development of such systems, based on new physical principles, to destroy missiles after launch, but before they actually reach their target. When President Reagan officially made the offer, in 1983, Soviet leaders rejected it.
LaRouche himself then made make brief remarks about the necessity of stopping the process leading to nuclear war, while at the same time moving to the urgent mission of organizing a planetary defense, against objects from the Solar System threatening the Earth. Three presentations followed which dealt with some of the
technical and political aspects of SDI implementation. The first was by Frank Cevasco, who was in the Office of the Secretary of Defense during the time of the Reagan announcement and its aftermath; the second by Kevin Zondervan, an aerospace engineer who gave a presentation authorized by the Missile Defense Agency, on the public domain information on the current Ballistic Missile Defense System; and the third by Ben Deniston
of LaRouchePAC, who went into the movement’s work on defense of the planet against asteroids.
The final presentation on the panel was by Bruce Fein, a constitutional lawyer and former Deputy Attorney General in the Reagan Administration, who spoke on the “Lessons of the Reagan Era for Today’s Challenges.” The Committee on Implementation of the International Global Monitoring Aerospace System (IGMASS) project, a Russian initiative for defense of Earth from seismic, weather, and space threats, sent greetings to the Schiller Institute conference in the form of a Russian TV feature on IGMASS, including an interview with the committee’s chairman, Prof. Anatoli Perminov (former head of Roscosmos, the Russian space agency). In a letter thanking the Schiller Institute conference organizers for giving “encouragement” to the IGMASS project, Perminov wrote, “We believe that realization of the Project in its pilot version will convince the world community [of the] feasibility of the high objectives of IGMASS, aimed at gradual development of a unified global security field with respect to global natural and man-made threats in the framework of a new paradigm of international cooperation, on the way to overcome existing tension and conflicts.”
The discussion period after this panel provided an opportunity to underscore that today’s Cheney-Obama vintage global Ballistic Missile Defense System is not a realization of the vision of LaRouche and Reagan for strategic cooperation against the threat of thermonuclear war. The BMDS does represent a threat to the strategic nuclear deterrent forces of Russia and China, something which would not have been the case with implementation of the full SDI conception of strategic cooperation, including “open laboratory” sharing of technology. A number of post-Soviet Russian offers for strategic defense cooperation have been rejected or ignored in the West, including Moscow’s 1993 “Trust” proposal for U.S.-Russian experiments on anti-missile “plasma weapon” technologies, and then Prime Minister Putin’s 2007 Kennebunkport overture for joint operation of anti-missile radars and other systems in Eurasia. The conference participants also heard greetings read from the first spokesman from the developing sector to endorse La-Rouche’s beam weapons proposal in the 1980s, Gen. Hector Fautario of Argentina.
Stopping the Hyperinflationary Blowout
The second panel of the conference featured presentations on LaRouche’s program to stop the breakdown crisis, and the organizing drive now underway in the United States to implement that program. One special contribution to the panel was a video address by Republican Representative Walter Jones, who urged the assembled to mobilize for the current House bill which would reinstate Glass-Steagall, HR 129, a bill of which he is a co-sponsor along with 45 others as of this writing. He also addressed the strategic crisis, by presenting his initiative demanding that Congress declassify 28 pages of the 9/11 Commission report, which would reveal that Saudi officials were behind the devastating 2001 attacks on the United States. After a keynote by EIR Ibero-American editor Dennis Small, which stressed the crucial economic parameter of the productive powers of labor as the means for evaluating an economy’s performance and potential, two state leaders presented reports on their battles for Glass-Steagall. State Rep. Thomas Jackson of Alabama, the chairman of the Alabama House Democratic Caucus, and James Benham, president of the Indiana Farmers Union, gave lively accounts of the conditions they face in organizing for bank separation in their respective states. Benham presented in particular the need for such protection in the agricultural sector.
Concluding the session were two LaRouche movement organizers actively involved in the fight in Washington, D.C. to pass LaRouche’s program: Michael Kirsch, who authored the La-RouchePAC’s latest proposal for a new National Bank, and Paul Gallagher, Economics Editor of EIR, who has been intimately involved in the drive for passing Glass-Steagall in Congress. Gallagher, who, as head of the Fusion Energy Foundation, also spearheaded the drive for the SDI in 1983, provided a crucial reflection comparing the fights then and now. Three months before Reagan announced the SDI, he said, everyone said it would never be done; today, “popular wisdom” in Washington also says Glass-Steagall will never be restored. With the proper fight by a leadership which knows what is at stake and can convey it, that popular wisdom will be proven wrong again.
The conference concluded with an evening concert, which uplifted the participants for the fight ahead.
E.I.R. STRATEGIC ALERT
www.eir.de Published by: E.I.R.GmbH, Bahnstr. 9a, 65205 Wiesbaden
Tel.: 0611/73650, Fax: 0611/7365101, Email: eirna@eirna.com
Verantwortl. f. d. Inhalt: Dean Andromidas, Claudio Celani
Subscription: EUR 3000/ ISSN 0936-7527
© E.I.R. GmbH Alle Rechte vorbehalten, auch die des Nachdrucks
von Auszügen, derphotomechanischen Wiedergabe und der Übersetzung,
Printed in Germany
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου